Organizational work-life initiativesContext matters -- France compared to the UK and the US
Organizational work-life initiatives
Context matters -- France compared to the UK and the US
Ollier-Malaterre
Ariane
Ollier-Malaterre, Ariane
Associate Professor, Rouen Business School
Author
Author
text
article
20092009monographic
2009
2009
monographic
Englisheng
English
eng
electronicapplication/pdf36 p.born digital
electronic
application/pdf
36 p.
born digital
Why are organizational work-life initiatives endorsed in some countries such as the US or the UK, while they generate little interest in France and other non Anglo-Saxon environments? In a qualitative theory-building approach, this article assesses the gap in workplace practices adoption among the US, the UK and France and analyzes in-depth interviews with 44 HR officers, employee representatives, unions and work-life service providers in France. Five main factors explain the adoption of organizational work-life initiatives in France and potentially other countries: (1) Employers versus State's legitimacy in the nonwork sphere of life (2) industrial relations and unions' stance towards work-life practices (3) the complexity of the legal framework (4) the awareness of work-life issues within HR departments and (5) the framing of work-life as a business or a social issue. With reference to prior research, a model is built to account for the influence of the national context on employees' expectations and employers' leeway at the macro level, and for strategic choices made by employers at the meso level.
Accepted manuscript.
Manuscript of article published in Community, Work & Family 12(2):159-178.
France
France
Global work-life strategy
Global work-life strategy
International work-life
International work-life
Multinational enterprises
Multinational enterprises
Work-family
Work-family
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13668800902778942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13668800902778942
This is the author's version of the work. The definitive version was published in Community, Work & Family, Volume 12 Issue 2, May 2009. doi:10.1080/13668800902778942 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13668800902778942)
fulltext.pdf
fulltext.pdf
MChBEnglisheng
MChB
Englisheng
English
eng