Oregon's guidelines for physician-assisted suicide A legal and ethical analysis
Oregon's guidelines for physician-assisted suicide
A legal and ethical analysis
O'Brien
Christine Neylon
O'Brien, Christine Neylon
Dept. of Business Law, Carroll School of Management
Author
Author
Madek
Gerald A.
Madek, Gerald A.
Author
Author
Ferrera
Gerald R.
Ferrera, Gerald R.
Author
Author
text
article
2000 2000 monographic
2000
2000
monographic
English eng
English
eng
electronic application/pdf digitized other analog
electronic
application/pdf
digitized other analog
Oregon's Death With Dignity Act was first passed by a ballot initiative in 1993, but numerous judicial challenges delayed implementation of the Act. This led to two momentous Supreme Court decisions, /Vacco v. Quill/, and /Washington v. Glucksberg/, ruling that states have the power to regulate physician-assisted suicide. Oregon voters upheld the ballot initiative, and this state became the first in the nation to authorize this practice. A state Task Force convened to publish a Guidebook to assist health care professionals in this area, and the preeminent New England Journal of Medicine issued a special report on this law. The author analyzes the legal context of the Oregon Death With Dignity Act, and discusses the efficacy of the tenets featured in the Guidebook. Further, the author explores ethical issues underlying the Guidelines, particularly those pertaining to the meaning of a patient's request for assisted suicide.
Version of record.
University of Pittsburgh Law Review 0041-9915 61 2 329 365 pp. 329-365 Winter 2000
University of Pittsburgh Law Review
University of Pittsburgh Law Review
0041-9915
61 2 329 365 pp. 329-365 Winter 2000
61
61
2
2
329 365 pp. 329-365
329
365
pp. 329-365
Winter 2000
Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States" (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/)
Business Law UPittsburghLR-v61-OBrienMadekFerrera-p329-QC.pdf UPittburghLR-v61-ObrienMadekFerrera-permissions-QC.pdf
Business Law
UPittsburghLR-v61-OBrienMadekFerrera-p329-QC.pdf
UPittburghLR-v61-ObrienMadekFerrera-permissions-QC.pdf
MChB English eng
MChB
English eng
English
eng