Court review of labor arbitration awards after the Supreme Court's Eastern Coal decision

Court review of labor arbitration awards after the Supreme Court's Eastern Coal decision

Court review of labor arbitration awards after the Supreme Court's Eastern Coal decision

Twomey

David P.

Twomey, David P.

Dept. of Business Law, Carroll School of Management

Author

Author

text

article

2001 2001 monographic

2001

2001

monographic

English eng

English

eng

electronic application/pdf digitized other analog

electronic

application/pdf

digitized other analog

This article addresses the law concerning judicial review of arbitrators’ decisions. Courts may become involved in the arbitration process at various stages in the dispute resolution process. It is the responsibility of courts for example, to determine whether a union and employer have agreed to arbitration. The author reviews the Supreme Court’s decision in Eastern Assoc. Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers where it considered the parameters of judicial power to set aside arbitration award on the basis that they violated public policy.

Version of record.

Business Law Review 1533-7421 34 177 187 pp. 177-187 Spring 2001

Business Law Review

Business Law Review

1533-7421

34 177 187 pp. 177-187 Spring 2001

34

34

177 187 pp. 177-187

177

187

pp. 177-187

Spring 2001

Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States" (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/)

Business Law BLR-v34-Twomey-p177-QC.pdf businessLawGlobalPermission.pdf businessLaw.jpg

Business Law

BLR-v34-Twomey-p177-QC.pdf

businessLawGlobalPermission.pdf

businessLaw.jpg

MChB English eng

MChB

English eng

English

eng