The impact of after-acquired evidence in employment discrimination cases after McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Company
The
impact of after-acquired evidence in employment discrimination cases after McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Company
O'Brien
Christine Neylon
O'Brien, Christine Neylon
Dept. of Business Law, Carroll School of Management
Author
Author
text
article
1996 1996 monographic
1996
1996
monographic
English eng
English
eng
electronic application/pdf digitized other analog
electronic
application/pdf
digitized other analog
This article follows up on the Supreme Court’s decision in /McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Company/. The author outlines the facts and holding of the Court, along with an extensive analysis on the meaning of the ruling that liability for employment discrimination is not automatically barred by after-acquired evidence. Noting that trial courts will be now drawn into complex calculation regarding remedies in such cases, the author offers several hypotheticals outlining a range of scenarios, as well as suggested solutions to this issue of after-acquired evidence in the remedies phase of a trial.
Version of record.
Creighton Law Review 0011-1155 29 2 675 689 pp. 675-689 February 1996
Creighton Law Review
Creighton Law Review
0011-1155
29 2 675 689 pp. 675-689 February 1996
29
29
2
2
675 689 pp. 675-689
675
689
pp. 675-689
February 1996
Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States" (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/)
Business Law CrLR-v29-OBrien-QC.pdf CrLR-v29-OBrien-permissions-QC.pdf CrLR-v29-OBrien-Cover-Thumbnail.jpg
Business Law
CrLR-v29-OBrien-QC.pdf
CrLR-v29-OBrien-permissions-QC.pdf
CrLR-v29-OBrien-Cover-Thumbnail.jpg
MChB English eng
MChB
English eng
English
eng