The law of after-acquired evidence in employment discrimination cases Clarification of the employer's burden, remedial guidance, and the enigma of post-termination misconduct
The
law of after-acquired evidence in employment discrimination cases
Clarification of the employer's burden, remedial guidance, and the enigma of post-termination misconduct
O'Brien
Christine Neylon
O'Brien, Christine Neylon
Dept. of Business Law, Carroll School of Management
Author
Author
text
article
1996 1996 monographic
1996
1996
monographic
English eng
English
eng
electronic application/pdf digitized other analog
electronic
application/pdf
digitized other analog
The article surveys the legal environment following the Supreme Court’s ruling in /McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Company/ that after-acquired evidence of employee wrongdoing is not an automatic bar to employer liability for employment discrimination. Three specific developments are detailed including employers’ burden of proof for limiting damages; the EEOCs Enforcement Guidance especially as it pertains to remedies; and a discussion subsequent trial court decisions construing the Supreme Court’s ruling. The author notes how this practice area continues to evolve and employers are still left in an uncertain position with regard to these cases.
Version of record.
UMKC Law Review 0047-7575 65 2 159 175 pp. 159-175 Winter 1996
UMKC Law Review
UMKC Law Review
0047-7575
65 2 159 175 pp. 159-175 Winter 1996
65
65
2
2
159 175 pp. 159-175
159
175
pp. 159-175
Winter 1996
Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States" (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/)
Business Law UMKCLR-v65-OBrien-p159-QC.pdf UMKCLR-v65-OBrien-permissions-QC.pdf
Business Law
UMKCLR-v65-OBrien-p159-QC.pdf
UMKCLR-v65-OBrien-permissions-QC.pdf
MChB English eng
MChB
English eng
English
eng