Physician-assisted suicide New protocol for a rightful death
Physician-assisted suicide
New protocol for a rightful death
O'Brien
Christine Neylon
O'Brien, Christine Neylon
Dept. of Business Law, Carroll School of Management
Author
Author
Madek
Gerald A.
Madek, Gerald A.
Author
Author
text
article
1998 1998 monographic
1998
1998
monographic
English eng
English
eng
electronic application/pdf digitized other analog
electronic
application/pdf
digitized other analog
An age-old dilemma plays out in the litigation surrounding physician-assisted suicide practices. It highlights the need to balance the rights of the individual with the expectations, goals, and values of society; but in a society as committed to individual autonomy as the United States, whose promise has been the right to control their own destinies, this conflict becomes central to preserving our heritage. We have attempted to negotiate between conflicting rights many times in judicial history. Such negotiations are rarely satisfactory to either side since it is a zero-sum outcome. In this history of negotiations calling for calibrating the line between individual and collective rights, nothing has been more contentious than whether there is a constitutional right to engage in physician-assisted suicide, notwithstanding the controversy over the constitutional right of privacy for women seeking abortions.
This Article reviews two appellate court decisions and the unanimous United States Supreme Court decision ruling that may prohibit physician-assisted suicide practices. The Article further explores the parameters of the effects of this ruling, and comments on future state legislation in this area, and in what circumstances the next constitutional challenge may arise.
Version of record.
Nebraska Law Review 0047-9209 77 2 229 280 pp. 229-280 1998
Nebraska Law Review
Nebraska Law Review
0047-9209
77 2 229 280 pp. 229-280 1998
77
77
2
2
229 280 pp. 229-280
229
280
pp. 229-280
1998
Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States" (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/)
Business Law NLR-v77-OBrienMadek-p229-QC.pdf NLR-v77-OBrienMadek-etc-QC.doc
Business Law
NLR-v77-OBrienMadek-p229-QC.pdf
NLR-v77-OBrienMadek-etc-QC.doc
MChB English eng
MChB
English eng
English
eng