Revising the minimum wage for the 1990s
Revising the minimum wage for the 1990s
O'Brien
Christine Neylon
O'Brien, Christine Neylon
Dept. of Business Law, Carroll School of Management
Author
Author
text
article
1989monographic
1989
monographic
Englisheng
English
eng
electronicapplication/pdfdigitized other analog
electronic
application/pdf
digitized other analog
This article examines the federal-wage floor concept of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) in light of the current legislative debate to increase the minimum wage. The arguments of proponents and opponents of the initial minimum wage law and its periodic increases have remained fairly constant over the past fifty years. The opponents' concerns about potential loss of jobs, negative impact upon businesses, and the economy and the questionable efficiency of the wage floor in reaching the neediest workers to eliminate poverty remain the most prevalent reasons cited. The harmful impact of a minimum wage increase on the competitiveness of U.S. business in the international sphere has emerged as the foremost issue of opponents in this decade.
Various groups affected by the pending legislation, i.e., women, youths, minorities and undocumented workers will be discussed, as well as the status of state minimum wage laws in the United States and the trends in some other countries away from government intervention in wage setting both through the collective bargaining process and via direct legislative enactment. Recent societal trends in the United States such as the increase in dual-earner families, and the decline in union membership resulting in less powerful advocacy for many economically disenfranchised workers who remain subject to the inequities inherent in the marketplace will be related to the controversy surrounding the minimum wage.
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal0277-541712v.1no.217248pp. 217-248December 1989
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal
0277-5417
12v.1no.217248pp. 217-248December 1989
12v.
12
v.
1no.
1
no.
217248pp. 217-248
217
248
pp. 217-248
December 1989
Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the "Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States" license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/)
Business LawCarroll School of Management. Dept. of Business Law
Business Law
Carroll School of Management. Dept. of Business Law
MChBEnglisheng
MChB
Englisheng
English
eng